Who is the next Steve Jobs?

Hola Todos!

Well, I understand where this is coming from, however, its still baffles me every time I read a story trying to answer this question.  It’s a great headline and the purpose of this headline is to generate interest and therefore page views.  This week happens to be the 1-year anniversary of the passing of Steve Jobs and many business journalists are treating the opportunity as a means to stir up…something.

Dan Gross’s article on CNNmoney.com is the latest to run with this trope.  It’s a nice list of the usual suspects (Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, Tim Cook, Jonathan Ive, & Elon Musk) as well as a few interesting choices (Marissa Mayer, Seth Priebatsch, a brief mention of Phil Schiller). I am somewhat surprised Jack Dorsey wasn’t on his list and I guess given the Apple Maps snafu, Scott Forstall (AKA Mini Steve) was also left off the list.

But to be honest and direct, these “lists” are bullshit.  Not because no one should ever be compared to Steve Jobs but because they are disingenuous to the other people on these lists.  Bezos, Zuckerberg, Musk, and many many other creative leaders not mentioned in these round ups are leaders and leaders lead.  They have their own goals and objectives, challenges and tribulations, and they do what is best for their firm. In other words, they are leaders in their own right and a comparison to others is a fruitless exercise.

Steve Jobs had many strengths, as well as, many weaknesses, and I doubt any of the leaders on these lists have “being more like Steve Jobs” on their “to-do” list when they get up this morning.

Something to think about today…


Best regards,

Dr. Dan-o


Daniel M. Ladik, PhD

Associate Professor of Marketing

Stillman School of Business

Seton Hall University







2 thoughts on “Who is the next Steve Jobs?

  1. I think it relates to Bill Belicheck and how teams in the NFL are looking for a “Mini Bill”. People, and especially with Belicheck, coaches under him, look to be the 2.0 version, and they attempt it by acting like him. I think what people do not understand is that both Jobs, like Belicheck, was insanely talented, but they succeed (in Jobs’ case this would be past tense) in spite of their people skills, which are both awful. The blueprint should not be how they act, but rather, striving to innovate, and strive to be better than both of them especially in terms of interpersonal relations. In both cases, rather than asking who can be the Mini-me to Jobs or Belicheck, the question should be, who can be better than them.

    • Hola Drew – thanks for the nice note. I think we’re on the same wave-length here. Something I’d like to add is many times, people attempt to emulate an icon and to the best of their ability, they cannot. However, in the process of their journey to benchmarking someone successful, they come into their own and equal of not better themselves vs. the icon they were shooting for. There is a long list of coaches, professors, musicians, artists, athletes, executives, etc that would agree with me on that sentiment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *